Loading...
 

Zephyr project on STM32

   Zephyr Workbench, a VSCode extension to manage Zephyr on STM32.
It enables users to easily create, develop, and debug Zephyr applications.
Main features:
  • Install host dependencies.
  • Import toolchain and SDK.
  • Create, configure, build and manage apps.
  • Debug STM32.
You can directly download it from the VSCode marketplace
For more details, visit the Zephyr Workbench

System Workbench for STM32

Forum List Topic List

[ prev topic ]  

SW4STM32 projects on Bitbucket, Github, etc?

Posted by HankB on 2017-02-18 16:05

Hi folks,
Are there licensing issues with putting SW4STM32 projects up on public repositories such as Github, Butbucket and similar?

Right now I’m working on integrating board support with an MX generated project and using the OpenSTM32 IDE to build on Linux. It seems to me that this might be useful to others as well.

There’s a myriad of licenses involved including HAL libraries, board support, code produced by MX, third party libraries like STemWin, FreeRTOS, LwIP and probably more. I’ve reviewed the licenses I could find and for the most part it seems that if I include the licenses distributed with the various parts, I remain compliant.

Is there anything I need to do to not violate any license for OpenSTM32?

Any other licensing issues I need to explore? I do plan to ask at the ST forum as well.

Thanks!

Reads: 6675
Link
Posted by dautrevaux on 2017-02-19 15:38 France

Hi,

There is no strings attached to the use of System Workbench for STM32. You can publish your code the way you want, on any platform you like. The licenses that are displayed apply to the tool itself or the firmware code provided by ST (that can only be used on STM32X MCUs) or others, but your code can be licensed on the licensing terms you prefer, as long as your license is only applying to your code (a license that would request licensing all code linked to your code to be licensed similarly may conflicts with the firmware license); however this is only a question fo choice for the licensing you apply to your code, not to constraints of the source code hosting platform.

Hoping this woll clarify things,

Bernard (Ac6)

PS: Note that this means that GPL may not be appropriate, while Apache will most certainly be. However, as usual, IANAL (I am not a lawyer wink)

Link

Posted by HankB on 2017-02-19 18:24

Hi Bernard,
Thank you for confirming that.

As for my code, there is actually very little at this point. I’m just combining MX output with HAL library examples and trying to get something that works. Eventually I will code something useful and will need to address license for my coda at that point and I will keep your copmments in mind.

Apologies for the typos in the message. The forum editor has put the cursor several characters to the right of the actual insert point and that makes editing a bit difficult.

Link

 

Newest Forum Posts

  1. Монтаж камина с грилем в Москве - установка и барбекю by KpddomErorb, 2025-05-10 18:28
  2. SPI on Nucleo_STMH533RE by royjamil, 2025-05-04 20:13
  3. SPI on Nucleo_STMH533RE by higginsa1, 2025-03-25 07:37
  4. SPI on Nucleo_STMH533RE by royjamil, 2025-03-23 11:31
  5. SPI on Nucleo_STMH533RE by higginsa1, 2025-03-23 09:33
  6. Configuring DMA for ADC in SW? by sam.hodgson, 2025-03-04 12:58
  7. Build a project in "release" mode by info@creosrl.it, 2025-02-20 18:12
  8. Build a project in "release" mode by info@creosrl.it, 2025-02-20 17:05
  9. Build a project in "release" mode by tang, 2025-02-20 10:36
  10. Build a project in "release" mode by info@creosrl.it, 2025-02-19 17:35

Last-Modified Blogs

  1. System Workbench for STM32