STM32 UART IDLE Detection vs. Modbus RTU Frame Timing
Hi everyone,
I’m looking into how to handle Modbus RTU communication on an STM32 using the HAL library and an RS-485 transceiver, and I have a question about receiving complete frames reliably.
One thing I’m trying to understand is the difference between using UART IDLE detection and a timer to detect the end of a Modbus RTU frame. Since IDLE detection can trigger after roughly one character time, it may not be enough to confirm the required 3.5-character silence between frames.
For example, at 9600 baud with 8E1 configuration, would you normally use a hardware timer that restarts whenever a byte arrives, or is there a better approach using the STM32 UART peripheral?
I’ve been reading some STM32 and RS-485 implementation notes, including a PCBCool technical guide, and I’m interested in how developers handle this in real projects.
A few things I’d like to understand:
- Do you prefer UART interrupts or DMA for receiving Modbus RTU frames?
- How do you reliably detect the end of a frame?
- Are there any common pitfalls with UART IDLE detection or receiver timeout configuration on STM32?
I’d appreciate hearing how others have implemented this, especially on STM32F4 or similar devices.
Thanks!